Service fault controversies
Over the past 14 months (and many tournaments) I've been involved in six specific incidents involving hidden serves. Five different times I've called for umpires or complained to umpires about opponents hiding their serves against a player I was coaching. Each case became a controversy as either the umpire wouldn't call the hidden serve, or if they did, and the opponent (or his coach or others in his contingent) became quite unhappy. In the other case where I complained about a fault on my player, an umpire simply got the rules wrong and faulted my player incorrectly for hiding a serve that clearly wasn't hidden. (Just for the record - players I coach were also correctly faulted several times along the way. Only that one time did I complained about a service fault called against a player I coached.)
Other than unhappy people, what's the one thing each case had in common? In every case I was right about the serve, as shown by video and photo sequences taken from the video. (I'm not going to fan the flames by publishing them, but if you were directly involved in one of these hidden serve controversies, feel free to email me and I'll show you the video and photo sequences.)
This isn't bragging. It's rather easy to see if a serve is hidden or not from the sidelines behind the players, where the coach sits, far easier than it is for the umpire off to the side. It's not a matter of being able to tell if the serve is hidden; it's a matter of choosing to speak up rather than let the opponent have the advantage of illegally hiding their serve. Some think a player or coach should just live with the disadvantage of having to face hidden serves, but I just don't buy that.
I generally don't worry about illegal serves unless the opponent is getting a serious advantage out of it. This usually means only on hidden serves, where players hide the ball with their arm, shoulder, body, or head. Other service rules are often abused, but none cause nearly as much trouble for the receiver as hidden serves. (Quick-serving out of the hand is sometimes a problem, but is so obviously illegal that any competent umpire will call it on the first instance.)
I've heard some crazy rationales for why it's "okay" to hide one's serve. (Note - hiding the serve means hiding the ball from the opponent during the serve motion, which is illegal, making it difficult for the opponent to read the spin on the serve. Usually this means hiding contact; sometimes it means hiding the ball until the split second before contact, when it's almost impossible to pick up the contact.) Here are some paraphrases of some of the best excuses:
-
"No one's called me on it before." (I know of at least one player who has used this excuse probably a dozen times. Thank about that! But even if it were true, then that doesn't change the fact that the serve is illegal; it simply means there has been lax umpiring.)
-
"That's the way everyone's serving." (Not true, but a lot do get away with it.)
-
"Why would you call me on serves?" (Because you are hiding your serve.)
-
"I'll call my opponent for serving illegally in practice, but no way should you call him on it in a tournament." (This is one of the stranger ones.)
-
"He's from your own player's club!" (So why is he hiding his serve against someone from his club who is not hiding his serve?)
It is true that many players get away with serving illegally, and umpires are notorious for not calling hidden serves in international matches. It's unfortunate but true that to compete internationally, our top players may have to develop hidden serves to compete against opponents who hide their serves and the umpire doesn't call it. And I have no problem with players hiding their serve if the opponent is doing so. But you better learn to serve legally if you are called for it - without argument - and you really shouldn't hide your serve against an opponent who is serving legally.
Unfortunately, these incidents have caused a lot of tension and are rather frustrating. Some think players and coaches shouldn't call opponents for hiding their serves, and are quick to show their anger at those who do. Others simply angrilly deny that the serves are hidden, despite the many witnesses (often including umpires and referees) and video that show otherwise. Alas.
By the way, in 36 years and about 600 tournaments, I've been faulted for my serve exactly once - and the umpire and referee both admitted afterwards they had made a mistake, that the serve was legal and shouldn't have been faulted. What happened? I'll write about that next week.
Service seminars
I plan on running a series of one-hour Serving Seminars at the Maryland Table Tennis Center, probably starting sometime in April or May. These will cover serving technique from beginning to advanced. The seminars will be both lecture/demonstration and on-the-table practice. Afterwards I may keep up a weekly 30-minute service session where players can get together and practice their serves. More on this later!
2012 U.S. Open
Here it is, the home page for the 2012 U.S. Open in Grand Rapids, Michigan, June 30-July 4. See you there!
Table Tennis Sports Psychology Book
Here's a new table tennis sports psychology book, "Get Your Game Face On! Table Tennis" by Dora Kurimay and Kathy Toon. I've downloaded it to my Kindle but haven't read it yet.
Kessel’s Handy Guide to Ruining Volleyball Player
While this was written for volleyball coaches, most of it applies to table tennis coaches as well! Some of my favorites:
-
"Never show what you want, if one thousand words will do. All explanations should be as wordy as possible to demonstrate your vast knowledge of the game."
-
"Make sure to always tell the player what he or she did wrong."
-
"Teach volleyball [table tennis] the way it is supposed to be taught, on the chalkboard."
-
"Make sure to bawl players out about their mistakes, win or lose. It is better to do this in front of a whole gym full of spectators, rather than in the locker room, or worse, one on one in private."
Table Tennis Benefit for Alzheimer's
Adam Bobrow, Susan Sarandon, and Soo Yeon Lee are among those who will take part in this benefit on March 4 in Los Angeles.
Kuwait Open Highlights Tape
Here's a highlights video (3:38) from the Kuwait Open of Jun Mizutani (JPN) vs. Kim Min Seok (KOR) in the quarterfinals, set to music.
Lady Antebellum Table Tennis
After a sold-out show on Feb. 17, the members of this country pop music group put on "The First Annual Lady A Ping-Pong Classic" (3:09).
***
Send us your own coaching news!
Re: March 1, 2012
I fail to understand the complaint.
Are you saying that tournaments other than the 'USA Team Trials' should decide who represents the country?
or maybe the complaint is that the first 5 people should be funded (until the 6th one complains)? [well, knowing you, I am pretty sure this is not the complaint. but putting it in here, 'cause it sounds cool.]
or maybe the issue is that the men/women's singles champion should always go and perhaps does not even have to play at the 'USA Team Trials'
Also, why should "age" and "native or non-native" bias any such decisions? I thought "no discrimination" of any sort, even if doing so is deterimental to the sport, is the hallmark of a democratic process.
Maybe you are angry at something else.
Re: March 1, 2012
A primary goal of USA Table Tennis is developing elite athletes. A teenager won Men's Singles at the USA Nationals. Few if any serious table tennis countries wouldn't fund such a player to the World Championships, where he can gain the necessary experience to become a world-class player.
Most countries that have a trials have a funded coach's pick so that they can make sure to bring in the most promising players. USATT has done that in the past, but stopped doing so. USATT has also used Men's Singles at the Nationals as the Team Trials. I would recommend both putting the Men's and Women's National Champions automatically on the National Team, and funding the coach's pick. The most promising player might not always be able to pay their way.
Are you saying I'm putting it in there because it sounds "cool," or you are? It's not clear. As to the sixth person, that's not relevant. My complaint wasn't that the #6 player wasn't funded, but that we set up a selection procedure that didn't end up with the best result for USA Table Tennis, i.e. having their teenaged national champion on the team. As to your knowing me, do you actually know me?
That I agree with. If you are the Men's or Women's Singles National Champion, you've already proven yourself. Ideally, they'd go back to combining the Team Trials with the Men's and Women's Singles Championships, but there were logistical complaints about too many matches per day.
You are correct - I shouldn't have said "native born," I should have said "USA trained." (Though he has trained in China the last two summers, most of his training has been in the U.S., which is where he primarily developed his game.) A major goal of USATT is to develop talent. That is different from importing it from other countries. (I will put in a small edit with a note. I'll just say "18-year-old National Men's Singles Champion.")
No, and I'm not sure why you would throw that in there. In a discussion, it's better to respond to one's ideas than to disparage one's motives without evidence.
Re: March 1, 2012
ok, i see your point here.
with regards to my comment on "6th player......", I meant to say: I don't think that the 'particular comment' is what your complaint is about. But nevertheless I am putting it in, just to make the argument complete and perhaps 'cool'.
hahaha....yes, I do not know you. just know you as much as a reader would know the writer.
totally agree with that. maybe USATT should work on a two pronged strategy:
The "Maybe you are angry at something else." comment was partly to say that 'maybe its actually some other aspect of this issue which is bothering you and has not been expressed properly" and partly to the blog-writer who maybe generally upset with something completely unrelated, but let that irritation creep into this write-up. (hey! that happens to human beings.)
So in this saga, what went wrong? after reading your blog post, I understand that the crux of the issue is: